True, the figure of registered unemployed has a high seasonal component, seasonal component, however, that there would be no rebound unless the economy.
It also shows the data on registered unemployment in the month of June is the extreme seasonality, produced in very large measure by that seasonal component but also by the culture of unjustified temporary nests in certain business segments.
So again, we must affirm that the economic crisis has neither its causes nor its responses in regulating the labor market. In any case, the relationship is reversed and the labor market terms reflect some of the consequences and effects of the crisis.
But what if the reform will bring, if not amended as reaclamando comes from trade unions, is an increase in layoffs, albeit with a lower cost and maintenance, if not growth, of temporality unjustified. Indeed, the previous labor reforms imposed, even today, its authors, made the balance.
And we have to do it, then the reforms imposed 84, 94, 2001 and 2002, are the high levels of temporality that today is our labor market adjustment mechanisms that occur via employment in difficult times like the present Express dismissal … ultimately all issues as job insecurity and others, which have ultimately stabilize and “normalize” what was meant to be unstable and temporary, to the now, some sectors are thrown their hands in their head , and yet in each and every one of those moments of applause under the same content, which “labor market rigidities are at the root ….”
Are those reforms, as it will, if not modified, which have helped to underpin the distinctive features that have characterized the pattern of growth in Spain, with respect to the core countries of the European Union, both in terms of production structure labor market, which have produced a strong link between productive specialization trend growth in activities with low levels of innovation and productivity and the segmentation of labor markets.
Because, even if repetitive, should be repeated a hundred times, which in relation to the greater impact that the crisis has had in Spain in terms of job losses and rising unemployment, which some attribute to the labor market failures, or causes are, or will, in the legal regulation of labor relations, but are an inevitable consequence of the evolution of Spanish production model and its labor market in recent years.
The answers neither are in the reduction of salaries of public employees, expanded in the case of some autonomous regions such as Madrid, public companies, or the freezing of pensions for 2011 or cuts public investment, nor is labor reform. The answers must be sought in the causes and not effects that make in Spain, with a fall in gross domestic product even lower than that produced in most European Union countries, has an unemployment rate that however, is much higher.
Economic recovery and growth come from other factors, which are primarily economic and in terms of employment, must be oriented to what is a priority in our country: changing the production model.
The correct address is therefore not being circulated by the government’s economic policy, you choose a reform that is unrelated to cut the deficit or to the containment of public spending. Also looking for economic recovery. It is aimed at another goal: cheaper, easier and supports the dismissal, hindering and weakening judicial control of it, very significantly modifies the reasons for the dismissals objectives for economic, technological, organizational or production does not prevent fraud temporary contracts or impose effective limits to it, breaks the sect oral collective bargaining system through its non-application in companies who claim economic hardship, giving a boost to the precariousness through the Etta in several sensitive sectors and risk such as construction and public administrations and liberalizing private placement. It is not ultimately the root of the differential in unemployment between Spain and the European Union.
In addition, it is an ominous direction today as yesterday to associate, flexibility and greater negative corporate power, with the creation of employment.
There are many reasons for the general strike on September 29, reasons that have a close relationship with the union struggle, a continuing dialectic between rights and democratic space won and the momentum for new ones.
When it violates the rights of workers, with many sacrifices and efforts have been conquered, we are ending up with a serious social conflict.
The union is and will remain a firm bulwark against backsliding, while a strong driver of change for a better consideration of social and professional work, to improve social conditions and labor of the working class.
As the union movement is aware that its scope musdecentrt inevitably transcend to the supranational space, precisely because the decentralization of production but does not prevent favors, further centralizing decision-making power.